Krebs Confronts Transparency

By Daniel Libit

The public’s right to know is on a collision course with Paul Krebs’ prerogative to keep certain things secret.

The University of New Mexico Athletic Director is attempting to resist journalistic scrutiny into Lobo sports, by engaging university lawyers and calling out potential leaks in his own department.

According to a copy of minutes from last week’s Athletic Department Leadership Team meeting, Krebs had plans to meet with the school’s Athletic Council to, “discuss the aggressive nature in which one reporter, Daniel Libit, requests information.”

Krebs also met with UNM’s attorneys; the school’s chief marketing officer, Cinnamon Blair; and Deputy Athletics Director Brad Hutchins to discuss the recent release of student-athlete exit interview notes to

Furthermore, Krebs issued a dictate that no Athletic Department employee is permitted to speak to this reporter, and that all communications must go through Lobo spokesman Frank Mercogliano.

“There is a leak in the athletic department that is providing information to the media,” Krebs said, according to the minutes, which were obtained by [You can see a copy below.]

Athletic Department sources say that in recent weeks, Krebs has been adamant about department employees refraining from emailing certain kinds of information, for fear that it may materialize in a public records request. has sent several requests for interviews and comments to Krebs since the website launched in November. Since then, Krebs has only replied once, by email, to a question about his dealings with WisePies owner Steve Chavez.

Krebs’ discussion about the university’s IPRA procedure came in the wake of’s recent report on the notes of student-athlete exit interviews.

“The meeting with the attorney was to gain a clarification as to why confidential student-athlete exit interviews were included in an IPRA request when they were specifically marked confidential, and the fact that student-athletes are not state employees,” said Mercogliano.

Blair described last week’s meeting as “an education process.”

“We needed to know what was considered confidential,” Blair told “It was really about making sure names weren’t included — that was really the crux of that meeting.”

Blair said that she ultimately did not find there to be anything improper with how the university released materials. has since alerted UNM to its plans to publish additional revelations from exit interviews in the near future.

“They (UNM) want to use the exit interviews as proper tools and make sure people could speak candidly in those interviews, in order to respond best to student concerns,” Blair said. “Really, people didn’t understand about FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), IPRA — these acronyms running around — which things were protected and weren’t.”

The university, as a public institution, is subject to the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act, which requires the school to provide public records except in certain, limited circumstances.

This website has made dozens of IPRA requests, some of which have been denied, redacted or determined to be immaterial. Last year, the university instituted a new provision that stipulated a copying fee for records that exceed 20 pages.

Separately, last week’s minutes also reveal UNM’s discussions for how it plans to handle the upcoming men’s basketball home game against Colorado State on Feb. 21. On Jan. 14, two Lobo assistant coaches were ejected at the end of the UNM-CSU game in Fort Collins, whereby assistant Terrence Rencher was later reprimanded for his role in a post-game spat with a Rams player.

For CSU’s return visit, UNM is contemplating a plan to erect a barricade of bike racks around the opposing team’s bus, as a means to provide additional security. “The event management team will be prepared for an aggressive crowd the night of the CSU game,” Krebs said, according to the minutes.

Also, according to the minutes, UNM has secured a $1 million naming rights gift for its Olympic Performance Center, with half of the money “secured.”

Emails sent Monday evening to Krebs, seeking comment for this story, were not returned by publication.

“The First Amendment is meaningless without the ability to acquire the information from government institutions in the first place,” said Peter St. Cyr, the executive director for the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government.  “The public official’s mindset should be focused on transparency, not on how to block the release of information since the state’s Sunshine Laws have very few exceptions and secrecy should be a rare exception.”

If you would like to send tips, anonymous or otherwise, please do so through this website’s contact form or by emailing



(photo in lead graphic illustration by Jethro Taylor/Flickr)

4 thoughts on “Krebs Confronts Transparency”

  1. Pingback: NM Fishbowl
  2. Pingback: NM Fishbowl
  3. Pingback: NM Fishbowl

Comments are closed.